lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat,  8 Apr 2023 09:43:48 -0400
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     harry.wentland@....com, sunpeng.li@....com,
        Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com, alexander.deucher@....com,
        christian.koenig@....com, Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...il.com,
        daniel@...ll.ch, Pavle.Kotarac@....com, Jun.Lei@....com,
        nicholas.kazlauskas@....com, Charlene.Liu@....com,
        aurabindo.pillai@....com, Dmytro.Laktyushkin@....com
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: set variables dml*_funcs storage-class-specifier to static

smatch reports
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:44:24: warning: symbol
  'dml20_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:51:24: warning: symbol
  'dml20v2_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:58:24: warning: symbol
  'dml21_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:65:24: warning: symbol
  'dml30_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:72:24: warning: symbol
  'dml31_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:79:24: warning: symbol
  'dml314_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c:86:24: warning: symbol
  'dml32_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?

These variables are only used in one file so should be static.
Cleanup whitespace, use tabs consistently for indents.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
 .../drm/amd/display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c | 24 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c
index 4125d3d111d1..bdf3ac6cadd5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.c
@@ -41,51 +41,51 @@
 #include "dcn32/display_rq_dlg_calc_32.h"
 #include "dml_logger.h"
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml20_funcs = {
+static const struct dml_funcs dml20_funcs = {
 	.validate = dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
 	.recalculate = dml20_recalculate,
 	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml20_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
 	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml20_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml20v2_funcs = {
+static const struct dml_funcs dml20v2_funcs = {
 	.validate = dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
 	.recalculate = dml20v2_recalculate,
 	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml20v2_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
 	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml20v2_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml21_funcs = {
-        .validate = dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
-        .recalculate = dml21_recalculate,
-        .rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml21_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
-        .rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml21_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
+static const struct dml_funcs dml21_funcs = {
+	.validate = dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
+	.recalculate = dml21_recalculate,
+	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml21_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
+	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml21_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml30_funcs = {
+static const struct dml_funcs dml30_funcs = {
 	.validate = dml30_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
 	.recalculate = dml30_recalculate,
 	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml30_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
 	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml30_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml31_funcs = {
+static const struct dml_funcs dml31_funcs = {
 	.validate = dml31_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
 	.recalculate = dml31_recalculate,
 	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml31_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
 	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml31_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml314_funcs = {
+static const struct dml_funcs dml314_funcs = {
 	.validate = dml314_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
 	.recalculate = dml314_recalculate,
 	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg = dml314_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
 	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg = dml314_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
 
-const struct dml_funcs dml32_funcs = {
+static const struct dml_funcs dml32_funcs = {
 	.validate = dml32_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull,
-    .recalculate = dml32_recalculate,
+	.recalculate = dml32_recalculate,
 	.rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg_v2 = dml32_rq_dlg_get_dlg_reg,
 	.rq_dlg_get_rq_reg_v2 = dml32_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg
 };
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ