lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQr+y2y5vCKSpA0THyakRUcRcS9X+X9i3mbhTYvnh1wHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Apr 2023 23:29:35 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] scripts/mksysmap: use sed with in-line comments

On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 4:00 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:53 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Move comments close to the code.
>
> Consider adding to the commit message why you switch from grep to sed;
> that's currently unclear.



I just thought "Move comments close to the code"
explained my motivation.,


I want to insert in-line comments.
Something like the following.
Apparently, it does not work.


$NM -n $1 | grep -v             \
         # comment1
        -e ' [aNUw] '           \
         # comment2
        -e ' \$'                \
         # comment3
        -e ' \.L'               \
         # comment4
        -e ' __crc_'            \
         # comment5
        -e ' __kstrtab_'        \
         # comment6
        -e ' __kstrtabns_'      \
         # comment7
        -e ' L0$'               \
> $2






> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> Orthogonal to this patch, don't .L prefixed local symbols not have
> entries in the symbol table? If they're not printed with nm, why
> filter them out (since they're impossible).


Sorry, I could not understand your question, but
you may get something from d4c858643263cfde13f7d937eaff95c2ed87cdf1
(you reviewed it)




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ