[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce0fffca-5965-87f1-c827-3e18e40727f2@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:19:07 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: imx2_wdt: set variables imx_wdt*
storage-class-specifier to static
On 4/8/23 07:34, Tom Rix wrote:
> smatch reports
> drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c:442:22: warning: symbol
> 'imx_wdt' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c:446:22: warning: symbol
> 'imx_wdt_legacy' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> These variables are only used in one file so should be static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
We already have that at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230228151648.4087637-1-linux@roeck-us.net/
but I don't really care which one Wim picks up, so
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Guenter
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c
> index 19ab7b3d286b..6fcc3596103c 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c
> @@ -439,11 +439,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx2_wdt_resume(struct device *dev)
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(imx2_wdt_pm_ops, imx2_wdt_suspend,
> imx2_wdt_resume);
>
> -struct imx2_wdt_data imx_wdt = {
> +static struct imx2_wdt_data imx_wdt = {
> .wdw_supported = true,
> };
>
> -struct imx2_wdt_data imx_wdt_legacy = {
> +static struct imx2_wdt_data imx_wdt_legacy = {
> .wdw_supported = false,
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists