linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Convert SiFive drivers from SOC_FOO dependencies to ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <834F56B9-E394-4F7C-97D8-BAA97F03362E@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 09 Apr 2023 09:58:42 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Convert SiFive drivers from SOC_FOO dependencies to ARCH_FOO



On 8 April 2023 06:47:59 IST, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:57:46PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> 
>> RISC-V's SOC_FOO symbols for micro-archs are going away, and being
>> replaced with the more common ARCH_FOO pattern that is used by other
>> archs (and by vendors with a history outside of RISC-V).
>
>And this is still the wrong way around.  This ARCH_ madness must not
>spread.  NAK.

As I said when you complained last, we asked the arm lads and there was no interest there in doing things differently & that's just one architecture.
Nor was there in adding a SOC_ symbol from some of the people who do more than one ISA.

You're welcome to send reverts for my first round of conversions and patches converting all the ARCH_ stuff RISC-V has to SOC_.
I'll happily ack a complete conversion to SOC_.
I don't care if it is arch or soc, I just want things to be used consistently.