lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:32:28 +0900
From:   Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
To:     jstultz@...gle.com, tjmercier@...gle.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jaewon31.kim@...il.com, Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf/heaps: system_heap: avoid too much allocation

Normal free:212600kB min:7664kB low:57100kB high:106536kB
  reserved_highatomic:4096KB active_anon:276kB inactive_anon:180kB
  active_file:1200kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:2932kB
  writepending:0kB present:4109312kB managed:3689488kB mlocked:2932kB
  pagetables:13600kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB
  free_cma:200844kB
Out of memory and no killable processes...
Kernel panic - not syncing: System is deadlocked on memory

An OoM panic was reported. The log shows there were only native
processes which are non-killable as OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN. After looking
into the dump, I've found the dma-buf system heap was trying to allocate
a huge size. It seems to be a signed negative value.

dma_heap_ioctl_allocate(inline)
    |  heap_allocation = 0xFFFFFFC02247BD38 -> (
    |    len = 0xFFFFFFFFE7225100,

To avoid this invalid request, check if the requested size is bigger
than system total memory. Actually the old ion system heap had similar
policy with commit c9e8440eca61 ("staging: ion: Fix overflow and list
bugs in system heap").

Even with this sanity check, there is still risk of too much allocations
from the system_heap. Allocating multiple big size buffers may cause
oom. Add __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL. With this gfp, the allocation may fail,
but we can avoid oom panic.

Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
index 920db302a273..583da8948679 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct dma_heap_attachment {
 	bool mapped;
 };
 
-#define LOW_ORDER_GFP (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO)
+#define LOW_ORDER_GFP (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)
 #define HIGH_ORDER_GFP  (((GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOWARN \
 				| __GFP_NORETRY) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) \
 				| __GFP_COMP)
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ static struct dma_buf *system_heap_allocate(struct dma_heap *heap,
 	struct page *page, *tmp_page;
 	int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
 
+	if (len / PAGE_SIZE > totalram_pages())
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
 	buffer = kzalloc(sizeof(*buffer), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!buffer)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ