[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDPSHYn02GWTSMG4@liuzhao-OptiPlex-7080>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 17:08:45 +0800
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Hellstr�m
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Christian K�nig <christian.koenig@....com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@...el.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915: Use kmap_local_page() in
gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
Thanks all for your review!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 05:32:17PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 17:32:17 +0200
> From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915: Use kmap_local_page() in
> gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
>
> On venerd? 31 marzo 2023 13:30:20 CEST Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On 31/03/2023 05:18, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> > However I am unsure if disabling pagefaulting is needed or not. Thomas,
> > Matt, being the last to touch this area, perhaps you could have a look?
> > Because I notice we have a fallback iomap path which still uses
> > io_mapping_map_atomic_wc. So if kmap_atomic to kmap_local conversion is
> > safe, does the iomap side also needs converting to
> > io_mapping_map_local_wc? Or they have separate requirements?
>
> AFAIK, the requirements for io_mapping_map_local_wc() are the same as for
> kmap_local_page(): the kernel virtual address is _only_ valid in the caller
> context, and map/unmap nesting must be done in stack-based ordering (LIFO).
>
> I think a follow up patch could safely switch to io_mapping_map_local_wc() /
> io_mapping_unmap_local_wc since the address is local to context.
>
> However, not being an expert, reading your note now I suspect that I'm missing
> something. Can I ask why you think that page-faults disabling might be
> necessary?
About the disabling of pagefault here, could you please talk more about
it? :-)
>From previous discussions and commit history, I didn't find relevant
information and I lack background knowledge about it...
If we have the reason to diable pagefault, I will fix and refresh the new
version.
Thanks,
Zhao
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabio
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tvrtko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists