linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] x86: profiling: remove lock functions hack for !FRAME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230410022226.181812-2-chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:22:25 +0800
From:   Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
To:     <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>, <akpm@...ux-foudation.org>,
        <ben-linux@...ff.org>, <wuchi.zero@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: profiling: remove lock functions hack for !FRAME_POINTER

Syzbot has been reporting the problem of stack-out-of-bounds in
profile_pc for a long time:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84fe685c02cd112a2ac3

profile_pc tries to get pc if current regs is inside lock function. For
!CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER it used a hack way to get the pc from stack, which
is not work with ORC. It makes profile_pc read illeagal address, return
wrong result, and frequently triggers KASAN.

Since lock profiling can be handled with much better other tools, It's
reasonable to remove lock functions hack for !FRAME_POINTER kernel.

Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/time.c | 14 +-------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
index e42faa792c07..e08fac7bb71e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time.c
@@ -29,22 +29,10 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
 
-	if (!user_mode(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+	if (!user_mode(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc))
 		return *(unsigned long *)(regs->bp + sizeof(long));
-#else
-		unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
-		/*
-		 * Return address is either directly at stack pointer
-		 * or above a saved flags. Eflags has bits 22-31 zero,
-		 * kernel addresses don't.
-		 */
-		if (sp[0] >> 22)
-			return sp[0];
-		if (sp[1] >> 22)
-			return sp[1];
 #endif
-	}
 	return pc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
-- 
2.17.1