linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: cisco: document the CrayAR compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 17:28:03 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@...co.com>
Cc:     "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>,
        "Marcin Wierzbicki -X (mawierzb - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco)" 
        <mawierzb@...co.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: cisco: document the CrayAR
 compatibles

On 07/04/2023 18:04, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>
>> Dual license.
>>
> 
> What are my choices here? I see this,
> 
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)

Yes, the one suggested by the checkpatch. Did you run it?

> 
> Which appears to be what your suggesting. I also see this,
> 
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> 
> I'd rather use the later.

Why? Bindings should be licensed under BSD, so what is the reason to
make here exception?

Best regards,
Krzysztof