[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230410175946.GD360889@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:59:46 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sandeen@...deen.net, david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Use for_each_perag_from() to iterate all
available AGs
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 09:30:29AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 01:07:27AM +0900, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
> > xfs_filestream_pick_ag() iterates all the available AGs when no
> > unassociated AGs are available by using for_each_perag_wrap().
> > To iterate all the available AGs, just use for_each_perag_from() instead.
> >
> >
> > This patch cleans up a code where xfs_filestream_pick_ag() iterates
> > all the available AGs when no unassociated AGs are available.
> > Current implementation is using a for_each_perag_wrap() macro which
> > iterates all AGs from start_agno through wrap_agno, wraps to
> > restart_agno, and then iterates again toward to (start_agno - 1).
> > In this case, xfs_filestream_pick_ag() start to iterate from 0 and
> > does't need to wrap. Although passing 0 as start_agno to
> > for_each_perag_wrap()
> > is not problematic, we have already a for_each_perag() macro family
> > which just iterates all AGs from 0 and doesn't wrap. Hense, I propose
> > to use for_each_perag() family simply.
> >
> >
> > Changes since v1 [1]:
> > Use for_each_perag_from() instead of for_each_perag() to clarify
> > where we are iterating from.
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/CAHpthZrvhqh8O1HO7U_jVnaq9R9Ur=Yq2eWzjWfNx3ryDbnGPA@mail.gmail.com/T/#m5704d0409bec1ce5273be0d3860e8ad60e9886fd
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c
> > index 22c13933c8f8..29acd9f7d422 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c
> > @@ -151,7 +151,8 @@ xfs_filestream_pick_ag(
Oh, also -- I ran the whole codebase through smatch this morning.
Could you please set @err to zero in its declaration above? If the
first for_each_perag_wrap never manages to get any perag structures
(currently impossible with the codebase) then err will be undefined and
probably nonzero.
CHECK fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c
fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c:120
xfs_filestream_pick_ag() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
--D
> > * grab.
> > */
> > if (!max_pag) {
> > - for_each_perag_wrap(args->mp, 0, start_agno, args->pag)
> > + start_agno = 0;
> > + for_each_perag_from(args->mp, start_agno, args->pag)
>
> IDGI. for_each_perag initializes the loop variable and calls
> for_each_perag_from, so this is open-coding an existing macro.
>
> If people are confused by the reuse of the function call parameter
> variable for the second loop, then either declare a new variable and let
> the compiler notice that we never use start_agno ever again and reuse
> a cpu register:
>
> if (!max_pag) {
> xfs_agnumber_t agno;
>
> for_each_perag(args->mp, agno, args->pag)
> break;
> ...
> }
>
> Or reuse it explicitly and leave a comment:
>
> if (!max_pag) {
> /*
> * Use any AG that we can grab. start_agno is no longer
> * pertinent here so we can reuse the variable.
> */
> for_each_perag(args->mp, start_agno, args->pag)
> break;
> ...
> }
>
> As a third alternative, I suppose you could encapsulate all of that into
> a dorky helper since I bet this isn't the first or the last time we're
> going to need something like this:
>
> static inline struct xfs_perag *
> xfs_perag_get_first_avail(
> struct xfs_mount *mp)
> {
> struct xfs_perag *pag;
> xfs_agnumber_t agno;
>
> for_each_perag(mp, agno, pag)
> return pag;
>
> ASSERT(0);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> if (!max_pag) {
> args->pag = xfs_perag_get_first_avail(mp);
> ...
> }
>
> --D
>
> > break;
> > atomic_inc(&args->pag->pagf_fstrms);
> > *longest = 0;
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists