lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8651fa1f-7f50-03c6-cd85-e61aa44d4927@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:47:34 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
        Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        tj@...nel.org
Cc:     paolo.valente@...aro.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] blk-cgroup: some cleanup

On 4/9/23 18:57, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi, Bart
> 
> 在 2023/04/08 2:41, Bart Van Assche 写道:
>> On 4/6/23 07:50, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>>> These are some cleanup patches of blk-cgroup. Thanks for review.
>>
>> With these patches applied, my kernel test VM crashes during boot. The 
>> following crash disappears if I revert these patches:
>>
>> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in bio_associate_blkg_from_css+0x83/0x240
>> Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000518 by task blkid/5885
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 
>> 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014
>> Call Trace:
>>   dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
>>   print_report+0x21e/0x260
>>   kasan_report+0xc2/0xf0
>>   __asan_load8+0x69/0x90
>>   bio_associate_blkg_from_css+0x83/0x240
>>   bfq_bio_bfqg+0xce/0x120 [bfq]
>>   bfq_bic_update_cgroup+0x2f/0x3c0 [bfq]
>>   bfq_init_rq+0x1e8/0xb10 [bfq]
>>   bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0xa3/0x420 [bfq]
>>   bfq_insert_requests+0xca/0xf0 [bfq]
>>   blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x4c0/0xb00
> 
> I found this call trace quite weird, I can't figure out how
> bfq_insert_requests can be called from blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list,
> can you show the add2line result?

Hi Kuai,

Thanks for having taken a look. I ran my tests with this patch series on 
top of Jens' for-next branch: "[PATCH v2 00/12] Submit zoned writes in 
order" 
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230407235822.1672286-1-bvanassche@acm.org/T/#m4c8c7ca5a5627510dc1709847b11589e8791b6b6). 
I will take a closer look and see which of these two patch series needs 
to be adjusted.

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ