[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kQ95gLdfSMNNbB5qn2WdJ7ujbXFwTpuHJQLK8v-qha6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:54:58 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Benno Lossin <y86-dev@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Alice Ryhl <alice@...l.io>,
Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] Rust pin-init API for pinned initialization of structs
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:25 PM Benno Lossin <y86-dev@...tonmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is the seventh version of the pin-init API. See [1] for v6.
Applied to `rust-next`. Thanks!
The `assume_init` patch was dropped from this one as discussed
elsewhere with Lina who sent a similar patch, which required adjusting
that patch's `SAFETY` comment. I also applied the `Reviewed-by`s from
here to there since it was essentially the same patch.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists