[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9994acf8-e0bc-55ce-9012-e36ef3b8ddab@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:39:23 +0200
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, ionela.voinescu@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] trace: energy_model: Add trace event for EM runtime
modifications
Hello Lukasz,
Just a suggestion, maybe it would be good to trace the CPUs affected by
the modification. It is possible to retrieve this information by going
to /sys/kernel/debug/energy_model/xxx/cpus, but might be simpler when
parsing a trace.
Regards,
Pierre
On 3/14/23 11:33, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> The Energy Model (EM) supports runtime modifications. Track the changes
> in order to do post-processing analysis. Don't use arrays in the trace
> event, since they are not properly supported by the tools. Instead use
> simple "unroll" with emitting the trace event for each EM array entry
> with proper ID information. The older debugging mechanism which was
> the simple debugfs which dumping the EM content won't be sufficient for
> the modifiable EM purpose. This trace event mechanism would address the
> needs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/energy_model.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/trace/events/energy_model.h
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/energy_model.h b/include/trace/events/energy_model.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f70babeb5dde
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/trace/events/energy_model.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM energy_model
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_ENERGY_MODEL_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_ENERGY_MODEL_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(em_perf_state,
> + TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, int nr_perf_states, int state,
> + unsigned long ps_frequency, unsigned long ps_power,
> + unsigned long ps_cost, unsigned long ps_flags),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(dev_name, nr_perf_states, state, ps_frequency, ps_power, ps_cost,
> + ps_flags),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(name, dev_name)
> + __field(int, num_states)
> + __field(int, state)
> + __field(unsigned long, frequency)
> + __field(unsigned long, power)
> + __field(unsigned long, cost)
> + __field(unsigned long, flags)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(name, dev_name);
> + __entry->num_states = nr_perf_states;
> + __entry->state = state;
> + __entry->frequency = ps_frequency;
> + __entry->power = ps_power;
> + __entry->cost = ps_cost;
> + __entry->flags = ps_flags;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev_name=%s nr_perf_states=%d state=%d frequency=%lu power=%lu cost=%lu flags=%lu",
> + __get_str(name), __entry->num_states, __entry->state,
> + __entry->frequency, __entry->power, __entry->cost,
> + __entry->flags)
> +);
> +#endif /* _TRACE_ENERGY_MODEL_H */
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> index 937e98a71ed5..3b778743ba89 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/energy_model.h>
> +
> /*
> * Mutex serializing the registrations of performance domains and letting
> * callbacks defined by drivers sleep.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists