lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:46:14 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 1/6] md: pass a md_thread pointer to
 md_register_thread()



On 2023-04-10 23:26, Song Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:34 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2023/04/11 9:15, Song Liu 写道:
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 4:37 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Prepare to protect md_thread with rcu, there are no functional changes.
>>>
>>> Why do we need this change? To add __rcu later?
>>
>> Add __rcu is one reason, more importantly is to assign md_thread inside
>> md_register_thread in patch 6:
>>
>> rcu_assign_pointer(*threadp, thread);
> 
> Got it.
> 
>>>
>>> Can we do something like:
>>>
>>> struct md_thread __rcu *md_register_thread(void (*run) (struct md_thread *),
>>>                 struct mddev *mddev, const char *name)
>>
>> I think this is not necessary, if we don't want to change api, we must
>> use rcu_assign_pointer for each caller to set md_thread.
> 
> I think it is better to use rcu_assign_pointer at the caller side.

I agree.

Logan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ