linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/schedutil: Add fast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jH4uatAR7HiGY_MYASOcdwxvwkUZaMCHcznd-0idLCUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:55:00 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
Cc:     ray.huang@....com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        gautham.shenoy@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/schedutil: Add fast_switch callback check

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:53 AM Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com> wrote:
>
> The set value of `fast_switch_enabled` flag doesn't guarantee that
> fast_switch callback is set. For some drivers such as amd_pstate, the
> adjust_perf callback is used but it still sets `fast_switch_possible`
> flag. This is not wrong because this flag doesn't imply fast_switch
> callback is set, it implies whether the driver can guarantee that
> frequency can be changed on any CPU sharing the policy and that the
> change will affect all of the policy CPUs without the need to send any
> IPIs or issue callbacks from the notifier chain.  Therefore add an extra
> NULL check before calling fast_switch in sugov_update_single_freq
> function.
>
> Ideally `sugov_update_single_freq` function should not be called with
> amd_pstate. But in a corner case scenario, when aperf/mperf overflow
> occurs, kernel disables frequency invariance calculation which causes
> schedutil to fallback to sugov_update_single_freq which currently relies
> on the fast_switch callback.

Yes, it does.  Which is why that callback must be provided if the
driver sets fast_switch_enabled.

Overall, adjust_perf is optional, but fast_switch_enabled can only be
set if fast_switch is actually present.

Please fix the driver.

>
> Normal flow:
>   sugov_update_single_perf
>     cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf
>       cpufreq_driver->adjust_perf
>
> Error case flow:
>   sugov_update_single_perf
>     sugov_update_single_freq  <-- This is chosen because the freq invariant is disabled due to aperf/mperf overflow
>       cpufreq_driver_fast_switch
>          cpufreq_driver->fast_switch <-- Here NULL pointer dereference is happening, because fast_switch is not set
>
> Fix this NULL pointer dereference issue by doing a NULL check.
>
> Fixes: a61dec744745 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid missing updates for one-CPU policies")
> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c        | 11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h          |  1 +
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 6d8fd3b8dcb5..364d31b55380 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2138,6 +2138,17 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_fast_switch);
>
> +/**
> + * cpufreq_driver_has_fast_switch - Check "fast switch" callback.
> + *
> + * Return 'true' if the ->fast_switch callback is present for the
> + * current driver or 'false' otherwise.
> + */
> +bool cpufreq_driver_has_fast_switch(void)
> +{
> +       return !!cpufreq_driver->fast_switch;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf - Adjust CPU performance level in one go.
>   * @cpu: Target CPU.
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 65623233ab2f..8a9286fc718b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -604,6 +604,7 @@ struct cpufreq_governor {
>  /* Pass a target to the cpufreq driver */
>  unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                                         unsigned int target_freq);
> +bool cpufreq_driver_has_fast_switch(void);
>  void cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>                                 unsigned long min_perf,
>                                 unsigned long target_perf,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index e3211455b203..a1c449525ac2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single_freq(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>          * concurrently on two different CPUs for the same target and it is not
>          * necessary to acquire the lock in the fast switch case.
>          */
> -       if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
> +       if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled && cpufreq_driver_has_fast_switch()) {
>                 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(sg_policy->policy, next_f);
>         } else {
>                 raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
> --
> 2.34.1
>