[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDWoL6o5LYgWP14y@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:34:23 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Xin3 Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Shan Kang <shan.kang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 33/33] KVM: x86/vmx: refactor VMX_DO_EVENT_IRQOFF to
generate FRED stack frames
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, Xin3 Li wrote:
> >
> > kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_IRQ);
> > - vmx_do_interrupt_irqoff(gate_offset(desc));
> > + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED))
> > + vmx_do_fred_interrupt_irqoff(vector);
> > + else
> > + vmx_do_interrupt_irqoff(gate_offset((gate_desc *)host_idt_base
>
>
> external_interrupt() is always available on x86_64, even when CONFIG_X86_FRED
> is not defined. I prefer to always call external_interrupt() on x86_64 for IRQ
> handling, which avoids re-entering noinstr code. how do you think? Too
> aggressive?
I think it's completely orthogonal to FRED enabling. If you or anyone else wants
to convert the non-FRED handling to external_interrupt(), then do so after FRED
lands, or at the very least in a separate patch after enabling FRED in KVM.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists