[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230411193548.GA2094947@ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:35:48 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RESEND 3/6] sparc/mm: don't unconditionally set HW
writable bit when setting PTE dirty on 64bit
Hi David.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:25:09PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On sparc64, there is no HW modified bit, therefore, SW tracks via a SW
> bit if the PTE is dirty via pte_mkdirty(). However, pte_mkdirty()
> currently also unconditionally sets the HW writable bit, which is wrong.
>
> pte_mkdirty() is not supposed to make a PTE actually writable, unless the
> SW writable bit -- pte_write() -- indicates that the PTE is not
> write-protected. Fortunately, sparc64 also defines a SW writable bit.
>
> For example, this already turned into a problem in the context of
> THP splitting as documented in commit 624a2c94f5b7 ("Partly revert "mm/thp:
> carry over dirty bit when thp splits on pmd""), and for page migration,
> as documented in commit 96a9c287e25d ("mm/migrate: fix wrongly apply write
> bit after mkdirty on sparc64").
>
> Also, we might want to use the dirty PTE bit in the context of KSM with
> shared zeropage [1], whereby setting the page writable would be
> problematic.
>
> But more general, any code that might end up setting a PTE/PMD dirty
> inside a VM without write permissions is possibly broken,
>
> Before this commit (sun4u in QEMU):
> root@...ian:~/linux/tools/testing/selftests/mm# ./mkdirty
> # [INFO] detected THP size: 8192 KiB
> TAP version 13
> 1..6
> # [INFO] PTRACE write access
> not ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
> not ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] Page migration
> ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] Page migration of THP
> ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
> ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
> not ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> Bail out! 3 out of 6 tests failed
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Test #3,#4,#5 pass ever since we added some MM workarounds, the
> underlying issue remains.
>
> Let's fix the remaining issues and prepare for reverting the workarounds
> by setting the HW writable bit only if both, the SW dirty bit and the SW
> writable bit are set.
>
> We have to move pte_dirty() and pte_dirty() up. The code patching
One of the pte_dirty() should be replaced with pte_write().
It would have been nice to separate moving and changes in two patches,
but keeping it together works too.
> mechanism and handling constants > 22bit is a bit special on sparc64.
>
> The ASM logic in pte_mkdirty() and pte_mkwrite() match the logic in
> pte_mkold() to create the mask depending on the machine type. The ASM
> logic in __pte_mkhwwrite() matches the logic in pte_present(), just
> using an "or" instead of an "and" instruction.
>
> With this commit (sun4u in QEMU):
> root@...ian:~/linux/tools/testing/selftests/mm# ./mkdirty
> # [INFO] detected THP size: 8192 KiB
> TAP version 13
> 1..6
> # [INFO] PTRACE write access
> ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
> ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] Page migration
> ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] Page migration of THP
> ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
> ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
> ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
> # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
Nice!
>
> This handling seems to have been in place forever.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/533a7c3d-3a48-b16b-b421-6e8386e0b142@redhat.com
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
I tried to follow your changes, but my knowledge of gcc assembler failed
me. But based on the nice and detailed change log and the code I managed
to understand:
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> ---
> arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 116 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> index 2dc8d4641734..5563efa1a19f 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -357,6 +357,42 @@ static inline pgprot_t pgprot_noncached(pgprot_t prot)
> */
> #define pgprot_noncached pgprot_noncached
>
> +static inline unsigned long pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask;
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "\n661: mov %1, %0\n"
> + " nop\n"
> + " .section .sun4v_2insn_patch, \"ax\"\n"
> + " .word 661b\n"
> + " sethi %%uhi(%2), %0\n"
> + " sllx %0, 32, %0\n"
> + " .previous\n"
> + : "=r" (mask)
> + : "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4U), "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4V));
> +
> + return (pte_val(pte) & mask);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long pte_write(pte_t pte)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask;
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "\n661: mov %1, %0\n"
> + " nop\n"
> + " .section .sun4v_2insn_patch, \"ax\"\n"
> + " .word 661b\n"
> + " sethi %%uhi(%2), %0\n"
> + " sllx %0, 32, %0\n"
> + " .previous\n"
> + : "=r" (mask)
> + : "i" (_PAGE_WRITE_4U), "i" (_PAGE_WRITE_4V));
> +
> + return (pte_val(pte) & mask);
> +}
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) || defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
> pte_t arch_make_huge_pte(pte_t entry, unsigned int shift, vm_flags_t flags);
> #define arch_make_huge_pte arch_make_huge_pte
> @@ -418,28 +454,43 @@ static inline bool is_hugetlb_pte(pte_t pte)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static inline pte_t __pte_mkhwwrite(pte_t pte)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = pte_val(pte);
> +
> + /*
> + * Note: we only want to set the HW writable bit if the SW writable bit
> + * and the SW dirty bit are set.
> + */
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "\n661: or %0, %2, %0\n"
> + " .section .sun4v_1insn_patch, \"ax\"\n"
> + " .word 661b\n"
> + " or %0, %3, %0\n"
> + " .previous\n"
> + : "=r" (val)
> + : "0" (val), "i" (_PAGE_W_4U), "i" (_PAGE_W_4V));
> +
> + return __pte(val);
> +}
> +
> static inline pte_t pte_mkdirty(pte_t pte)
> {
> - unsigned long val = pte_val(pte), tmp;
> + unsigned long val = pte_val(pte), mask;
>
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> - "\n661: or %0, %3, %0\n"
> - " nop\n"
> - "\n662: nop\n"
> + "\n661: mov %1, %0\n"
> " nop\n"
> " .section .sun4v_2insn_patch, \"ax\"\n"
> " .word 661b\n"
> - " sethi %%uhi(%4), %1\n"
> - " sllx %1, 32, %1\n"
> - " .word 662b\n"
> - " or %1, %%lo(%4), %1\n"
> - " or %0, %1, %0\n"
> + " sethi %%uhi(%2), %0\n"
> + " sllx %0, 32, %0\n"
> " .previous\n"
> - : "=r" (val), "=r" (tmp)
> - : "0" (val), "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4U | _PAGE_W_4U),
> - "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4V | _PAGE_W_4V));
> + : "=r" (mask)
> + : "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4U), "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4V));
>
> - return __pte(val);
> + pte = __pte(val | mask);
> + return pte_write(pte) ? __pte_mkhwwrite(pte) : pte;
> }
>
> static inline pte_t pte_mkclean(pte_t pte)
> @@ -481,7 +532,8 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
> : "=r" (mask)
> : "i" (_PAGE_WRITE_4U), "i" (_PAGE_WRITE_4V));
>
> - return __pte(val | mask);
> + pte = __pte(val | mask);
> + return pte_dirty(pte) ? __pte_mkhwwrite(pte) : pte;
> }
>
> static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
> @@ -584,42 +636,6 @@ static inline unsigned long pte_young(pte_t pte)
> return (pte_val(pte) & mask);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
> -{
> - unsigned long mask;
> -
> - __asm__ __volatile__(
> - "\n661: mov %1, %0\n"
> - " nop\n"
> - " .section .sun4v_2insn_patch, \"ax\"\n"
> - " .word 661b\n"
> - " sethi %%uhi(%2), %0\n"
> - " sllx %0, 32, %0\n"
> - " .previous\n"
> - : "=r" (mask)
> - : "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4U), "i" (_PAGE_MODIFIED_4V));
> -
> - return (pte_val(pte) & mask);
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long pte_write(pte_t pte)
> -{
> - unsigned long mask;
> -
> - __asm__ __volatile__(
> - "\n661: mov %1, %0\n"
> - " nop\n"
> - " .section .sun4v_2insn_patch, \"ax\"\n"
> - " .word 661b\n"
> - " sethi %%uhi(%2), %0\n"
> - " sllx %0, 32, %0\n"
> - " .previous\n"
> - : "=r" (mask)
> - : "i" (_PAGE_WRITE_4U), "i" (_PAGE_WRITE_4V));
> -
> - return (pte_val(pte) & mask);
> -}
> -
> static inline unsigned long pte_exec(pte_t pte)
> {
> unsigned long mask;
> --
> 2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists