[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87119ec6-43e1-6062-93dc-be133fdeb88a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:10:41 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Tim Zimmermann <tim@...ux4.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] thermal/drivers/intel_pch_thermal: Use thermal
driver device to write a trace
On 11/04/2023 20:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:53 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The pch_critical() callback accesses the thermal zone device structure
>> internals, it dereferences the thermal zone struct device and the 'type'.
>>
>> For the former, the driver related device should be use instead and
>> for the latter an accessor already exists. Use them instead of
>> accessing the internals.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
>> index dce50d239357..0de46057db2a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
>> @@ -127,7 +127,10 @@ static int pch_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd, int *temp)
>>
>> static void pch_critical(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd)
>> {
>> - dev_dbg(&tzd->device, "%s: critical temperature reached\n", tzd->type);
>> + struct pch_thermal_device *ptd = thermal_zone_device_priv(tzd);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&ptd->pdev->dev, "%s: critical temperature reached\n",
>> + thermal_zone_device_type(tzd));
>
> No, this just makes the code more complex than it is and the only
> reason seems to be "cleanliness".
>
> Something like
>
> thermal_zone_dbg(tzd, "critical temperature reached\n");
>
> would work, the above doesn't. Sorry.
Why not add a trace directly in handle_critical_trips() in
thermal_core.c and remove this one ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists