[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f88a1c56-4078-63a2-ab52-69523c3fdcd8@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:21:49 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"open list:ACPI THERMAL DRIVER" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] thermal/drivers/acpi: Make cross dev link optional
by configuration
On 11/04/2023 20:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:53 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The ACPI thermal driver creates a link in the thermal zone device
>> sysfs directory pointing to the device sysfs directory. At the same
>> time, it creates a back pointer link from the device to the thermal
>> zone device sysfs directory.
>>
>> From a generic perspective, having a device pointer in the sysfs
>> thermal zone directory may make sense. But the opposite is not true as
>> the same driver can be related to multiple thermal zones.
>>
>> The usage of these information is very specific to ACPI and it is
>> questionable if they are really needed.
>>
>> Let's make the code optional and disable it by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> index 5763db4528b8..70f1d28810f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> @@ -787,9 +787,44 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device_ops acpi_thermal_zone_ops = {
>> .critical = acpi_thermal_zone_device_critical,
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL_SYSFS_OBSOLETE_SINGULARITY
>
> It is OK to move the code to the separate functions below, but it is
> not OK to make it depend on the Kconfig option above.
>
> The extra sysfs things were added in different drivers for different
> reasons. Making them all depend on one Kconfig option is just wrong.
Ok, I'll do the changes accordingly.
Thanks for reviewing the series
[ ... ]
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists