[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDT39frTIqpX5p9O@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:02:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: firmware: Clarify firmware path usage
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 04:12:32PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 4/10/2023 3:43 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:
> >
> > > Newline characters will be taken into account for the firmware search
> > > path parameter, warn users about that and provide an example using 'echo
> > > -n' such that it clarifies the typical use of that parameter.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fw_search_path.rst | 9 +++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fw_search_path.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fw_search_path.rst
> > > index a360f1009fa3..d7cb1e8f0076 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fw_search_path.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/fw_search_path.rst
> > > @@ -22,5 +22,10 @@ can use the file:
> > > * /sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path
> > > -You would echo into it your custom path and firmware requested will be
> > > -searched for there first.
> > > +You would echo into it your custom path and firmware requested will be searched
> > > +for there first. Be aware that newline characters will be taken into account
> > > +and may not produce the intended effects. For instance you might want to use:
> > > +
> > > +echo -n /path/to/script > /sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path
> > > +
> > > +to ensure that your script is being used.
> >
> > So I have no problem with applying this, but I have to ask...might it
> > not be better to fix the implementation of that sysfs file to strip
> > surrounding whitespace from the provided path? This patch has the look
> > of a lesson learned the hard way; rather than codifying this behavior
> > into a feature, perhaps we could just make the next person's life a bit
> > easier...?
>
> I was not sure whether it was on purpose or not, Greg, will we break
> anyone's use case if we strip off \n from the firmware path passed via
> sysfs?
I do not know, sorry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists