linux-kernel - Re: [v2] cpufreq: sparc: Fix exception handling in two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230411064051.qyioheeoectj2lv3@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:10:51 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...ia.fr,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2] cpufreq: sparc: Fix exception handling in two functions

On 11-04-23, 08:15, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> The setting of the variables “cpufreq_us…_driver” influences the need
> >> to reset them to null pointers for the desired exception handling,
> >> doesn't it?
> >
> > This is what all should be done for these drivers I guess. There is no
> > points doing the dance of {de}allocating resources unnecessarily.
> 
> Are you going to integrate your source code adjustment according to
> reduced dynamic memory allocation?

You can prepare and send a patch for this if you want, else I will do
it.

-- 
viresh