linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/percpu_counter: fix dying cpu compare race

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:56:48 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        cl@...ux.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, yury.norov@...il.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
        yebin10@...wei.com, yebin@...weicloud.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/percpu_counter: fix dying cpu compare race

On Mon, Apr 10 2023 at 22:53, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06 2023 at 09:56, Ye Bin wrote:
> cpu_dying_mask is a random number generator w/o cpu_hotplug_lock being
> held. And even with that lock held any cpumask operation on it is silly.
> The mask is a core detail:
>
>   commit e40f74c535b8 "cpumask: Introduce DYING mask"
>     
>     Introduce a cpumask that indicates (for each CPU) what direction the
>     CPU hotplug is currently going. Notably, it tracks rollbacks. Eg. when
>     an up fails and we do a roll-back down, it will accurately reflect the
>     direction.
>
> It does not tell anything to a user which is not aware of the actual
> hotplug state machine state.

Even if the mask is most of the time stable, it's a total disaster
performance wise. The bits in cpu_dying_mask are sticky until the next
online operation.

So for a system which has SMT enabled in BIOS, but SMT is disabled on
the kernel command line or later via the sysfs knob, this means that the
loop in __percpu_counter_sum() will iterate over all shutdown SMT
siblings forever. IOW, it will touch nr_of_shutdown_cpus() cachelines
for absolutely zero reason.

The same applies for the proposed counter.

Thanks,

        tglx