lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:29:47 -0500
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     Kornel Dulęba <korneld@...omium.org>,
        "Gong, Richard" <richard.gong@....com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        regressions@...mhuis.info,
        Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
        Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        upstream@...ihalf.com, rad@...ihalf.com, mattedavis@...gle.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: amd: Disable and mask interrupts on resume


On 4/10/23 11:32, Kornel Dulęba wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:17 PM Kornel Dulęba <korneld@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 5:29 PM Gong, Richard <richard.gong@....com> wrote:
>>> On 4/10/2023 12:03 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>> On 3/20/23 04:32, Kornel Dulęba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This fixes a similar problem to the one observed in:
>>>>> commit 4e5a04be88fe ("pinctrl: amd: disable and mask interrupts on
>>>>> probe").
>>>>>
>>>>> On some systems, during suspend/resume cycle firmware leaves
>>>>> an interrupt enabled on a pin that is not used by the kernel.
>>>>> This confuses the AMD pinctrl driver and causes spurious interrupts.
>>>>>
>>>>> The driver already has logic to detect if a pin is used by the kernel.
>>>>> Leverage it to re-initialize interrupt fields of a pin only if it's not
>>>>> used by us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kornel Dulęba <korneld@...omium.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>>>>    1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>>>>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>>>>> index 9236a132c7ba..609821b756c2 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>>>>> @@ -872,32 +872,34 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops amd_pinconf_ops
>>>>> = {
>>>>>        .pin_config_group_set = amd_pinconf_group_set,
>>>>>    };
>>>>>    -static void amd_gpio_irq_init(struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev)
>>>>> +static void amd_gpio_irq_init_pin(struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev, int pin)
>>>>>    {
>>>>> -    struct pinctrl_desc *desc = gpio_dev->pctrl->desc;
>>>>> +    const struct pin_desc *pd;
>>>>>        unsigned long flags;
>>>>>        u32 pin_reg, mask;
>>>>> -    int i;
>>>>>          mask = BIT(WAKE_CNTRL_OFF_S0I3) | BIT(WAKE_CNTRL_OFF_S3) |
>>>>>            BIT(INTERRUPT_MASK_OFF) | BIT(INTERRUPT_ENABLE_OFF) |
>>>>>            BIT(WAKE_CNTRL_OFF_S4);
>>>>>    -    for (i = 0; i < desc->npins; i++) {
>>>>> -        int pin = desc->pins[i].number;
>>>>> -        const struct pin_desc *pd = pin_desc_get(gpio_dev->pctrl, pin);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -        if (!pd)
>>>>> -            continue;
>>>>> +    pd = pin_desc_get(gpio_dev->pctrl, pin);
>>>>> +    if (!pd)
>>>>> +        return;
>>>>>    -        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
>>>>> +    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
>>>>> +    pin_reg = readl(gpio_dev->base + pin * 4);
>>>>> +    pin_reg &= ~mask;
>>>>> +    writel(pin_reg, gpio_dev->base + pin * 4);
>>>>> +    raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
>>>>> +}
>>>>>    -        pin_reg = readl(gpio_dev->base + i * 4);
>>>>> -        pin_reg &= ~mask;
>>>>> -        writel(pin_reg, gpio_dev->base + i * 4);
>>>>> +static void amd_gpio_irq_init(struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    struct pinctrl_desc *desc = gpio_dev->pctrl->desc;
>>>>> +    int i;
>>>>>    -        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
>>>>> -    }
>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < desc->npins; i++)
>>>>> +        amd_gpio_irq_init_pin(gpio_dev, i);
>>>>>    }
>>>>>      #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>>>> @@ -950,8 +952,10 @@ static int amd_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>>>        for (i = 0; i < desc->npins; i++) {
>>>>>            int pin = desc->pins[i].number;
>>>>>    -        if (!amd_gpio_should_save(gpio_dev, pin))
>>>>> +        if (!amd_gpio_should_save(gpio_dev, pin)) {
>>>>> +            amd_gpio_irq_init_pin(gpio_dev, pin);
>>>>>                continue;
>>>>> +        }
>>>>>              raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
>>>>>            gpio_dev->saved_regs[i] |= readl(gpio_dev->base + pin * 4)
>>>>> & PIN_IRQ_PENDING;
>>>> Hello Kornel,
>>>>
>>>> I've found that this commit which was included in 6.3-rc5 is causing a
>>>> regression waking up from lid on a Lenovo Z13.
>>> observed "unable to wake from power button" on AMD based Dell platform.
>>> Reverting "pinctrl: amd: Disable and mask interrupts on resume" on the
>>> top of 6.3-rc6 does fix the issue.
>> Whoops, sorry for the breakage.
>> Could you please share the output of "/sys/kernel/debug/gpio" before
>> and after the first suspend/resume cycle.
> Oh and also I'd need to compare the output from this with and without
> this patch reverted.

I've attached the requested output to the bug for all 3 cases for the Z13.

6.3-rc6 (broken lid resume)

6.3-rc6 + patch below (broken lid resume)

6.3-rc6 + revert (works from lid)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217315

>> I've looked at the patch again and found a rather silly mistake.
>> Please try the following.
>> Note that I don't have access to hardware with this controller at the
>> moment, so I've only compile tested it.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> index 609821b756c2..7e7770152ca8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static void amd_gpio_irq_init(struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev)
>>          int i;
>>
>>          for (i = 0; i < desc->npins; i++)
>> -               amd_gpio_irq_init_pin(gpio_dev, i);
>> +               amd_gpio_irq_init_pin(gpio_dev, desc->pins[i].number);
>>   }
>>
This unfortunately doesn't help the behavior at all.
>>>> Reverting it on top of 6.3-rc6 resolves the problem.
>>>>
>>>> I've collected what I can into this bug report:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217315
>>>>
>>>> Linus Walleij,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like this was CC to stable.  If we can't get a quick solution
>>>> we might want to pull this from stable.
>>> this commit landed into 6.1.23 as well
>>>
>>>           d9c63daa576b2 pinctrl: amd: Disable and mask interrupts on resume
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ