lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eef8a06064dc895f183ba2a1cd649c213f3e37.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:24:33 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Denis Plotnikov <den-plotnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com,
        sony.chacko@...gic.com, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com,
        helgaas@...nel.org, simon.horman@...igine.com, manishc@...vell.com,
        shshaikh@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] qlcnic: check pci_reset_function result

On Fri, 2023-04-07 at 10:18 +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> Static code analyzer complains to unchecked return value.
> The result of pci_reset_function() is unchecked.
> Despite, the issue is on the FLR supported code path and in that
> case reset can be done with pcie_flr(), the patch uses less invasive
> approach by adding the result check of pci_reset_function().
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Fixes: 7e2cf4feba05 ("qlcnic: change driver hardware interface mechanism")
> Signed-off-by: Denis Plotnikov <den-plotnikov@...dex-team.ru>

Any special reason to target the net-next tree? This looks like a -net
candidate to me?

Thanks!

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ