lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85323eb2-cfc7-d1b8-3a75-3fa63dde29db@fujitsu.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 02:43:46 +0000
From:   "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To:     Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     "haris.iqbal@...os.com" <haris.iqbal@...os.com>,
        "jinpu.wang@...os.com" <jinpu.wang@...os.com>,
        "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 2/3] RDMA/rtrs: Fix rxe_dealloc_pd warning



On 10/04/2023 21:10, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/10/23 20:08, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:43:03AM +0000, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>> The warning occurs when destroying PD whose reference count is not zero.
>>>
>>> Precodition: clt_path->s.con_num is 2.
>>> So 2 cm connection will be created as below:
>>> CPU0                                              CPU1
>>> init_conns {                              |
>>>    create_cm() // a. con[0] created        |
>>>                                            |  a'. rtrs_clt_rdma_cm_handler() {
>>>                                            |    rtrs_rdma_addr_resolved()
>>>                                            |      create_con_cq_qp(con); << con[0]
>>>                                            |  }
>>>                                            | in this moment, refcnt of PD was increased to 2+
>>>                                            |
>>>    create_cm() // b. cid = 1, failed       |
>>>      destroy_con_cq_qp()                   |
>>>        rtrs_ib_dev_put()                   |
>>>          dev_free()                        |
>>>            ib_dealloc_pd(dev->ib_pd) << PD |
>>>             is destroyed, but refcnt is    |
>>>             still greater than 0           |
>>> }
>>>
>>> Simply, Here we can avoid this warning by introducing conn own flag to
>>> track if its cleanup should drop the PD.
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>   rnbd_client L597: Mapping device /dev/nvme0n1 on session client, (access_mode: rw, nr_poll_queues: 0)
>>>   ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26407 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c:256 __rxe_cleanup+0x13a/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
>>>   Modules linked in: rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser rnbd_client libiscsi rtrs_client scsi_transport_iscsi rtrs_core rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm crc32_generic rdma_rxe udp_tunnel ib_uverbs ib_core kmem device_dax nd_pmem dax_pmem nd_
>>> vme crc32c_intel fuse nvme_core nfit libnvdimm dm_multipath scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
>>>   CPU: 0 PID: 26407 Comm: rnbd-client.sh Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0-rc6-roce-flush+ #53
>>>   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>>>   RIP: 0010:__rxe_cleanup+0x13a/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
>>>   Code: 45 84 e4 0f 84 5a ff ff ff 48 89 ef e8 5f 18 71 f9 84 c0 75 90 be c8 00 00 00 48 89 ef e8 be 89 1f fa 85 c0 0f 85 7b ff ff ff <0f> 0b 41 bc ea ff ff ff e9 71 ff ff ff e8 84 7f 1f fa e9 d0 fe ff
>>>   RSP: 0018:ffffb09880b6f5f0 EFLAGS: 00010246
>>>   RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff99401f15d6a8 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>>   RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffbac8234b RDI: 00000000ffffffff
>>>   RBP: ffff99401f15d6d0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
>>>   R10: 0000000000002d82 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
>>>   R13: ffff994101eff208 R14: ffffb09880b6f6a0 R15: 00000000fffffe00
>>>   FS:  00007fe113904740(0000) GS:ffff99413bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>   CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>   CR2: 00007ff6cde656c8 CR3: 000000001f108004 CR4: 00000000001706f0
>>>   DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>   DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>   Call Trace:
>>>    <TASK>
>>>    rxe_dealloc_pd+0x16/0x20 [rdma_rxe]
>>>    ib_dealloc_pd_user+0x4b/0x80 [ib_core]
>>>    rtrs_ib_dev_put+0x79/0xd0 [rtrs_core]
>>>    destroy_con_cq_qp+0x8a/0xa0 [rtrs_client]
>>>    init_path+0x1e7/0x9a0 [rtrs_client]
>>>    ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
>>>    ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
>>>    ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x80
>>>    ? pcpu_alloc+0x3dd/0x7d0
>>>    ? rtrs_clt_init_stats+0x18/0x40 [rtrs_client]
>>>    rtrs_clt_open+0x24f/0x5a0 [rtrs_client]
>>>    ? __pfx_rnbd_clt_link_ev+0x10/0x10 [rnbd_client]
>>>    rnbd_clt_map_device+0x6a5/0xe10 [rnbd_client]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 4 ++++
>>>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.h | 1 +
>>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
>>> index c2065fc33a56..4c8f42e46e2f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
>>> @@ -1664,6 +1664,7 @@ static int create_con_cq_qp(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
>>>               return -ENOMEM;
>>>           }
>>>           clt_path->s.dev_ref = 1;
>>> +        con->has_dev = true;
>>>           query_fast_reg_mode(clt_path);
>>>           wr_limit = clt_path->s.dev->ib_dev->attrs.max_qp_wr;
>>>           /*
>>> @@ -1690,6 +1691,7 @@ static int create_con_cq_qp(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
>>>           wr_limit = clt_path->s.dev->ib_dev->attrs.max_qp_wr;
>>>           /* Shared between connections */
>>>           clt_path->s.dev_ref++;
>> Without looking in the code, I would expect dev_ref from the line above
>> to perform PD protection.
> 
> Agreed.

Sorry, i didn't get your point. Do you mean something like this:

+		con->has_dev = true;
  		clt_path->s.dev_ref++;



Thanks
Zhijian

> 
> Thanks,
> Guoqing

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ