linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Support probing of misaligned access performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230411-prefix-rename-71ab4af0324a@wendy>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:06:49 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
CC:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>, <slewis@...osinc.com>,
        <heiko@...ech.de>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        <vineetg@...osinc.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...osinc.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Celeste Liu <coelacanthus@...look.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Support probing of misaligned
 access performance

On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:11:01PM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> This allows userspace to select various routines to use based on the
> performance of misaligned access on the target hardware.
> 
> Rather than adding DT bindings, this change taps into the alternatives
> mechanism used to probe CPU errata. Add a new function pointer alongside
> the vendor-specific errata_patch_func() that probes for desirable errata
> (otherwise known as "features"). Unlike the errata_patch_func(), this
> function is called on each CPU as it comes up, so it can save
> feature information per-CPU.
> 
> The T-head C906 has fast unaligned access, both as defined by GCC [1],
> and in performing a basic benchmark, which determined that byte copies
> are >50% slower than a misaligned word copy of the same data size (source
> for this test at [2]):
> 
> bytecopy size f000 count 50000 offset 0 took 31664899 us
> wordcopy size f000 count 50000 offset 0 took 5180919 us
> wordcopy size f000 count 50000 offset 1 took 13416949 us
> 
> [1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc#L353
> [2] https://pastebin.com/EPXvDHSW
> 
> Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>

I think I had given you an R-b a few versions back, guess it was dropped
due to changes or w/e :)

Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Perhaps at some point the "errata" naming of those files should change,
but today is not that day.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)