[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230410202935.d1abf62f386eefb1efa36ce4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:29:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org,
David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] maple_tree: Use correct variable type in sizeof
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:35:13 +0800 Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com> wrote:
> The type of variable pointed to by pivs is unsigned long, but the type
> used in sizeof is a pointer type. Change it to unsigned long.
Thanks, but there's nothing in this changelog which explains why a
-stable backport is being proposed. When fixing a bug, please always
describe the user-visible effects of that bug.
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -3255,7 +3255,7 @@ static inline void mas_destroy_rebalance(struct ma_state *mas, unsigned char end
>
> if (tmp < max_p)
> memset(pivs + tmp, 0,
> - sizeof(unsigned long *) * (max_p - tmp));
> + sizeof(unsigned long) * (max_p - tmp));
>
> if (tmp < mt_slots[mt])
> memset(slots + tmp, 0, sizeof(void *) * (max_s - tmp));
Is there any situation in which
sizeof(unsigned long *) != sizeof(unsigned long)?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists