linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZDV2Nvs57Orx47tj@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:01:10 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@...cinc.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>,
        Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:40:28PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:55:20AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 02:38:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > After merging the driver-core tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > 
> > > In file included from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
> > >                  from include/linux/kernel.h:17,
> > >                  from drivers/accel/qaic/mhi_qaic_ctrl.c:4:
> > > drivers/accel/qaic/mhi_qaic_ctrl.c: In function 'mhi_qaic_ctrl_init':
> > > include/linux/export.h:27:22: error: passing argument 1 of 'class_create' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > >    27 | #define THIS_MODULE (&__this_module)
> > >       |                     ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >       |                      |
> > >       |                      struct module *
> > > drivers/accel/qaic/mhi_qaic_ctrl.c:544:38: note: in expansion of macro 'THIS_MODULE'
> > >   544 |         mqc_dev_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, MHI_QAIC_CTRL_DRIVER_NAME);
> > >       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from include/linux/device.h:31,
> > >                  from include/linux/mhi.h:9,
> > >                  from drivers/accel/qaic/mhi_qaic_ctrl.c:5:
> > > include/linux/device/class.h:229:54: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'struct module *'
> > >   229 | struct class * __must_check class_create(const char *name);
> > >       |                                          ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> > > drivers/accel/qaic/mhi_qaic_ctrl.c:544:25: error: too many arguments to function 'class_create'
> > >   544 |         mqc_dev_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, MHI_QAIC_CTRL_DRIVER_NAME);
> > >       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/linux/device/class.h:229:29: note: declared here
> > >   229 | struct class * __must_check class_create(const char *name);
> > >       |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > 
> > > Caused by commit
> > > 
> > >   1aaba11da9aa ("driver core: class: remove module * from class_create()")
> > > 
> > > interacting with commit
> > > 
> > >   566fc96198b4 ("accel/qaic: Add mhi_qaic_cntl")
> > > 
> > > from the drm tree.
> > > 
> > > I have applied the following merge fix patch for today.
> > > 
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:16:57 +1000
> > > Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "driver core: class: remove module * from class_create()"
> > > 
> > > interacting with "accel/qaic: Add mhi_qaic_cntl"
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > 
> > Thanks for the fixup. Since Dave is out I've made a note about this in my
> > handover mail so it won't get lost in the drm-next merge window pull. I
> > don't think we need any other coordination than mention it in each pull to
> > Linus, topic tree seems overkill for this. Plus there's no way I can
> > untangle the drm tree anyway :-).
> 
> Want me to submit a patch for the drm tree that moves this to use
> class_register() instead, which will make the merge/build issue go away
> for you?  That's my long-term goal here anyway, so converting this new
> code to this api today would be something I have to do eventually :)

We kinda closed drm-next for feature work mostly already (just pulling
stuff in from subtrees), so won't really help for this merge window.

For everything else I think this is up to Oded, I had no idea qaic needed
it's entire own dev class and I don't want to dig into this for the risk I
might freak out :-)

Adding Oded.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch