[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412152037.upiciyn5zhmilw3r@box>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:20:37 +0300
From: "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"jane.chu@...cle.com" <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/tdx: Support vmalloc() for
tdx_enc_status_changed()
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:28:20PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a reason to use one vs. the other?
> slow_virt_to_phys() is x86-only, but that's not a problem here.
slow_virt_to_phys() is more generic as it works for non-vmalloc addresses,
but generally they are equivalent for the use.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists