[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412-no_stackp-v1-2-46a69b507a4b@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:32:13 -0700
From: ndesaulniers@...gle.com
To: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization for
newer toolchains
prevent_tail_call_optimization was added in
commit a9a3ed1eff36 ("x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try")
to work around stack canaries getting inserted into functions that would
initialize the stack canary in the first place.
Now that we have no_stack_protector function attribute (gcc-11+,
clang-7+) and use it on start_kernel, remove the call to
prevent_tail_call_optimization such that we may one day remove it
outright.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
init/main.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index 213baf7b8cb1..c8503d02dfa6 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -1152,7 +1152,12 @@ void start_kernel(void)
/* Do the rest non-__init'ed, we're now alive */
arch_call_rest_init();
+ /* Avoid stack canaries in callers of boot_init_stack_canary for gcc-10
+ * and older.
+ */
+#if !__has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
prevent_tail_call_optimization();
+#endif
}
/* Call all constructor functions linked into the kernel. */
--
2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists