linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-elish-*: Fix panel compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:28:26 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-elish-*: Fix panel compatibles

On 2023-04-12 22:23:25, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
[..]
> >>> foo b4 requires i put something here
> >>
> >> What?
> > git checkout linux-next/master
> > <craft a single patch>
> git checkout -b branchname
> > b4 prep -e $(cat localversion-next| cut -c 2-)

I think that could just be:

    b4 prep -n branchname

(in favour of prep -e _and_ checkout -b)

Might also need to pass `-f $(cut -c 2- localversion-next)` to get the
forkpoint right though.

> > b4 prep --edit-cover
> > /* you get a bunch of EDITMEs that b4 really insists you fill out */

And what if you remove the line entirely?

- Marijn