linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 RESEND 3/6] sparc/mm: don't unconditionally set HW writable bit when setting PTE dirty on 64bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230412141508.d91f9e07df9dd840219098ed@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:15:08 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RESEND 3/6] sparc/mm: don't unconditionally set HW
 writable bit when setting PTE dirty on 64bit

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:48:15 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:

> >> We have to move pte_dirty() and pte_dirty() up. The code patching
> > One of the pte_dirty() should be replaced with pte_write().
> > 
> 
> Indeed, thanks. I assume Andrew can change the latter to pte_write(). 

It was a struggle, but I managed to do this ;)