[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9ae523ae-aad4-40b1-8b6b-d5e18bf8b92a@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:33:15 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Nick Terrell" <terrelln@...com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@...mide.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
"Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Xin Li" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
"Seung-Woo Kim" <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
"Paul Bolle" <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM ZSTD boot compression
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 23:21, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> This patchset enables ZSTD kernel (de)compression on 32-bit ARM.
> Unfortunately, it is much slower than I hoped (tested on ARM926EJ-S):
>
> - LZO: 7.2 MiB, 6 seconds
> - ZSTD: 5.6 MiB, 60 seconds
That seems unexpected, as the usual numbers say it's about 25%
slower than LZO. Do you have an idea why it is so much slower
here? How long does it take to decompress the
generated arch/arm/boot/Image file in user space on the same
hardware using lzop and zstd?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists