lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:22:13 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the powerpc tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig

between commit:

  78f0929884d4 ("powerpc/64: Always build with 128-bit long double")

from the powerpc tree and commit:

  4652ae7a51b7 ("drm/amd/display: Rename DCN config to FP")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (I used the powerpc version - with "(PPC64 && ALTIVEC)")
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ