[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d9ed10d-12ee-792f-fc34-60a8e432c5d2@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:31:48 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] iommu/vt-d: Fix operand size in bitwise operation
On 4/12/23 5:22 AM, David Laight wrote:
>> Sent: 11 April 2023 07:48
>>
>> From: Tina Zhang<tina.zhang@...el.com>
>>
>> The patch fixes the klocwork issues that operands in a bitwise operation
>> have different size at line 1692 of dmar.c, line 1898 and line 1907 of
>> iommu.c.
> Why is this any kind of thing that needs fixing?
This description is a bit misleading. Actually I queued it as a cleanup
patch.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists