lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d9ed10d-12ee-792f-fc34-60a8e432c5d2@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:31:48 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@...el.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] iommu/vt-d: Fix operand size in bitwise operation

On 4/12/23 5:22 AM, David Laight wrote:
>> Sent: 11 April 2023 07:48
>>
>> From: Tina Zhang<tina.zhang@...el.com>
>>
>> The patch fixes the klocwork issues that operands in a bitwise operation
>> have different size at line 1692 of dmar.c, line 1898 and line 1907 of
>> iommu.c.
> Why is this any kind of thing that needs fixing?

This description is a bit misleading. Actually I queued it as a cleanup
patch.

Best regards,
baolu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ