linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] dt-bindings: power: Constrain properties for JH7110 PMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230412-trifle-outplayed-8a1c795fab8b@wendy>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:42:12 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>
CC:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Walker Chen <walker.chen@...rfivetech.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] dt-bindings: power: Constrain properties for
 JH7110 PMU

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:51:16PM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/4/12 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 11/04/2023 08:47, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> >> When use "starfive,jh7110-pmu-dphy" compatible, do not need the reg and
> >> interrupts properties.
> [...]
> >>  
> >>  description: |
> >>    StarFive JH7110 SoC includes support for multiple power domains which can be
> >> @@ -17,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> >>    compatible:
> >>      enum:
> >>        - starfive,jh7110-pmu
> >> +      - starfive,jh7110-pmu-dphy
> > 
> > You do here much more than commit msg says.
> > 
> > Isn'y DPHY a phy? Why is it in power?
> > 
> 
> OK, I will add more description. This is a power framework used to turn on/off 
> DPHY. So it in power, not a phy.

Perhaps tie it less to its role w/ the phy, and more to do with its
location, say "jh7110-aon-pmu"?
There's already "aon"/"sys"/"stg" stuff used in clock-controller and
syscon compatibles etc.

Krzysztof, what do you think of that? (if you remember the whole
discussion we previously had about using those identifiers a few weeks
ago).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)