[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDaCyFdzlPmoi6qK@matsya>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:37:04 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: intel_auxdevice: improve pm_prepare step
On 23-03-23, 10:52, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>
> In the case where multiple peripherals are attached on the same link,
> it's possible that they are in different pm_runtime states.
>
> The device_for_each_child() loop to resume all devices before a system
> suspend would not work if one peripheral was active and others
> suspended. pm_runtime_resume() returns 1 in the former case, which is
> taken as a error. As a result, a pm_runtime suspended device might be
> skipped if the first device was active.
>
> This patch changes the behavior of the helper function to only return
> zero or a negative error. A Fixes tag is not provided since there are
> no existing configurations on Intel platforms with different types of
> devices on the same link. Amplifiers may be used on the same link, but
> they are used by the same dailink so their pm_runtime state is always
> matching. This assumption may not be true in the future, so we should
> improve the behavior and align with AMD.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists