[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412105542.1231131-2-amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:55:41 +0200
From: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
CC: <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] mfd: stmfx: Fix error path in stmfx_chip_init
In error path, disable vdd regulator if it exists, but don't overload ret.
Because if regulator_disable() is successful, stmfx_chip_init will exit
successfully while chip init failed.
Fixes: 06252ade9156 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
---
drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
index e281971ba54e..bfe89df27611 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
err:
if (stmfx->vdd)
- return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+ regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists