[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf4bda7a88bd5f33bd3bdc7fc715bc24fa4add8f.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:08:21 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] LoongArch: Use larch_insn_gen_break() for kprobes
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 18:05 +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> -static inline bool insns_not_supported(union loongarch_instruction insn)
> +static inline bool insns_not_supported(u32 code)
> {
> + union loongarch_instruction insn;
> +
> + insn.word = code;
> +
I remember Xuerui disliked this change. Maybe we can add
__attribute__ (__transparent_union__) [1] for union
loongarch_instruction instead?
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Type-Attributes.html#index-transparent_005funion-type-attribute
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists