lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf4bda7a88bd5f33bd3bdc7fc715bc24fa4add8f.camel@xry111.site>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:08:21 +0800
From:   Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Cc:     loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] LoongArch: Use larch_insn_gen_break() for kprobes

On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 18:05 +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> -static inline bool insns_not_supported(union loongarch_instruction insn)
> +static inline bool insns_not_supported(u32 code)
>  {
> +       union loongarch_instruction insn;
> +
> +       insn.word = code;
> +

I remember Xuerui disliked this change.  Maybe we can add
__attribute__ (__transparent_union__) [1] for union
loongarch_instruction instead?

[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Type-Attributes.html#index-transparent_005funion-type-attribute

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ