[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412114400.GB628377@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:44:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the block tree
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Peter, what do you think, should we make track uaccess state across
> function boundaries?
So IIRC the goal was to explicitly dis-allow that. You want minimal code
executed with STAC and hence disallow calling stuff.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists