linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG RAM slice through phandle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <198523f5-d06f-15cd-af6c-f391c02bcaa9@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:47:53 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG
 RAM slice through phandle



On 7.04.2023 13:36, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:55:40PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> [...]
>> I don't really know what kind.. I can add something like:
>>
>> rpm {
>> 	compatible = "qcom,rpm", "simple-mfd";
>>
>> 	mpm: interrupt-controller {
>> 	...
>> };
>>
> 
> IMO we should indeed add something like this, because the current
> representation of the RPM below the top level /smd node is misleading.
> "SMD" is not a device, bus, component or anything like that. It is just
> the communication protocol. There should not be a top-level DT node for
> this.
> 
> Instead there should be a dedicated device tree node for the RPM like in
> your example above, which will allow adding properties and subnodes to
> it as needed.
> 
> For unrelated reasons I actually have some patches for this, that switch
> the /smd top-level node to a "remoteproc-like" node dedicated to the
> RPM, similar to how WCNSS/ADSP/Modem/etc are represented. I need this to
> add additional (optional) properties like "resets" and "iommus" for the
> RPM, but it would allow adding arbitrary subnodes as well:
> 
> https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/linux/commit/35231ac28703805daa8220f1233847c7df34589e
> 
> I could finish those up and post them if that would help...
Krzysztof, what do you think?

On a note, the bindings check is gone with dtschema-2023.4

Konrad
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephan
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> index dcbc5972248b22..1c24b01bd268c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> @@ -310,10 +310,10 @@
>  		};
>  	};
>  
> -	smd {
> -		compatible = "qcom,smd";
> +	rpm: remoteproc-rpm {
> +		compatible = "qcom,msm8916-rpm-proc", "qcom,rpm-proc";
>  
> -		rpm {
> +		smd-edge {
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>  			qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
>  			qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
> 
>