[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fe5c9c5-6eb0-86ae-9e5d-fbaa72be25fe@wolfvision.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:57:36 +0200
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
<devnull+michael.riesch.wolfvision.net@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthias Fend <Matthias.Fend@...fvision.net>,
libcamera-devel@...ts.libcamera.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libcamera-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/4] media: v4l2-ctrls: add lens
group status controls for zoom and focus
Hi Sakari,
On 4/12/23 13:50, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Michael Riesch wrote:
>> - Different controls: If moving = (V4L2_CID_FOCUS_ABSOLUTE == current),
>> then what happens if the application performs a
>> V4L2_CID_FOCUS_RELATIVE with -3? current should reach 39,
>> V4L2_CID_FOCUS_ABSOLUTE is still at 42, the lens is still moving from
>> the application's point of view.
>
> Would there be a reason to implement both of these controls in a single
> driver? AFAIU, the relative one should be used if there absolute value
> isn't known to the driver.
Probably not, but on the other hand there is nothing the prevents a
driver developer from doing so, right? Point is that should there be a
driver which does implement both controls, we are in trouble AFAIU.
Best regards,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists