[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e1341b234484a924e6b03fe0453c3ee29a100c3.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:26:11 +0000
From: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
<Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>
To: "amergnat@...libre.com" <amergnat@...libre.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Singo Chang (張興國)
<Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"jonson.wang@...iatek.com" <jonson.wang@...iatek.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nathan Lu (呂東霖) <Nathan.Lu@...iatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rex-BC Chen (陳柏辰)
<Rex-BC.Chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/mediatek: Add ability to support dynamic
connector selection
Hi Alexandre,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 11:37 +0200, Alexandre Mergnat wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Can you give me the based git tree/branch for this series please ?
> I want to do a non-regression test for mt8365-evk board.
>
Sorry for missing this information, I'll add this into [PATCH 0/2] at
next version.
It based on mediatek-drm maintainer's tree / mediatek-drm-next branch :
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chunkuang.hu/linux.git/log/?h=mediatek-drm-next
> Feedback below:
>
> On 05/04/2023 16:51, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> > 1. Move output drm connector from each ddp_path array to connector
> > array.
> > 2. Add dynamic select available connector flow in crtc create and
> > enable.
> > snip...
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > index d40142842f85..5ff20d0de29b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > @@ -60,8 +60,13 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc {
> > struct device *mmsys_dev;
> > struct device *dma_dev;
> > struct mtk_mutex *mutex;
> > +
>
> Remove this extra line please.
>
OK, I'll remove it.
> > + unsigned int ddp_comp_nr_ori;
> > + unsigned int max_ddp_comp_nr;
> > unsigned int ddp_comp_nr;
> > struct mtk_ddp_comp **ddp_comp;
> > + unsigned int conn_route_nr;
> > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes;
> >
> > /* lock for display hardware access */
> > struct mutex hw_lock;
> > @@ -649,6 +654,85 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct
> > drm_crtc *crtc)
> > mtk_ddp_comp_disable_vblank(comp);
> > }
> >
> > +static unsigned int mtk_drm_crtc_max_num_route_comp(struct
> > mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int max_num = 0;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + if (!mtk_crtc->conn_route_nr)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->conn_route_nr; i++)
> > + max_num = (max_num > mtk_crtc-
> > >conn_routes[i].route_len) ? max_num :
> > + mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_len;
>
> if test is true, then do "max_num = max_num"
> I'm not sure the compiler will optimize that.
> Also, I think it more readable like that:
>
> if (max_num < mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_len) {
> max_num = mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_len;
> }
>
OK, I'll refine this.
> > +
> > + return max_num;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > + struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > +{
> > + int crtc_index = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
> > + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = state-
> > >crtcs[crtc_index].new_state;
> > + unsigned int encoder_mask = crtc_state->encoder_mask;
> > + struct mtk_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc = to_mtk_crtc(crtc);
> > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes;
> > + unsigned int route_len = 0, route_index = 0;
> > + unsigned int comp_id;
> > + int i;
>
> Can you put them in alphabetical order please ?
>
OK, I'll put them in alphabetical order.
> > +
> > + if (!mtk_crtc->conn_route_nr)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > snip...
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h
> > index 3e9046993d09..96790f8f7a94 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #define MTK_DRM_CRTC_H
> >
> > #include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> > +#include "mtk_drm_drv.h"
>
> Alphabetical order please.
OK, I'll put them in alphabetical order.
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
>
> > #include "mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h"
> > #include "mtk_drm_plane.h"
> >
> > @@ -18,7 +19,9 @@ void mtk_drm_crtc_commit(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> > int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> > const unsigned int *path,
> > unsigned int path_len,
> > - int priv_data_index);
> > + int priv_data_index,
> > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes,
> > + unsigned int conn_routes_num);
> > int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
> > drm_plane *plane,
> > struct mtk_plane_state *state);
> > void mtk_drm_crtc_async_update(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
> > drm_plane *plane,
>
>
> Regards,
> Alexandre
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists