[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5df5cac-5258-7f5c-d386-6b17391b080e@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:30:59 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Deming Wang <wangdeming@...pur.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: huge_memory: Replace obsolete memalign() with
posix_memalign()
On 12.04.23 12:45, Deming Wang wrote:
> memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage.
>
> Replace memalign() with posix_memalign()
>
> As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *one_page
> to NULL to silence a warning about the function's return value being
Where is the initialization to NULL done below?
> used as uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error
> is properly checked before p is returned).
"p" ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@...pur.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> index cbb5e6893cbf..94c7dffc4d7d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> @@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ void split_pmd_thp(void)
> char *one_page;
> size_t len = 4 * pmd_pagesize;
> size_t i;
> + int ret;
>
> - one_page = memalign(pmd_pagesize, len);
> -
> - if (!one_page) {
> + ret = posix_memalign((void **)&one_page, pmd_pagesize, len);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> printf("Fail to allocate memory\n");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists