[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412132327.GA629496@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:23:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: make __get_wchan() use arch_stack_walk()
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 10:08:22PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 04:15:52PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > > Make __get_wchan() use arch_stack_walk() directly to
> > > avoid open-coding of unwind logic.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> >
> > Can we just have a shared version of __get_wchan() for all
> > CONFIG_ARCH_STACKWALK arches?
>
> Didn't I do that a while back ? I can't seem to actually find the
> patch-set though :/
Could be this series:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211022150933.883959987@infradead.org
And this here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjHbKfck1Ws4Y0pUZ7bxdjU9eh2WK0EFsv65utfeVkT9Q@mail.gmail.com/
might be why I dropped it.. I can't remember.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists