linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clean up uprobes for MIPS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230412133219.GE11717@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:32:19 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clean up uprobes for MIPS

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:17:46PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> When I read uprobes code of all archs, I found that some code for MIPS
> is useless, so do some cleanups.
> 
> Tiezhu Yang (2):
>   MIPS: Use def_bool y for ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES
>   MIPS: Remove set_swbp() in uprobes.c
> 
>  arch/mips/Kconfig          |  3 +--
>  arch/mips/kernel/uprobes.c | 18 ------------------
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

series applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]