linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "accel/qaic: Add mhi_qaic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZDa/77pcZyr+W2Be@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:27:59 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
Cc:     daniel@...ll.ch, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, greg@...ah.com,
        ogabbay@...nel.org, jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com,
        quic_pkanojiy@...cinc.com, mani@...nel.org, airlied@...hat.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "accel/qaic: Add mhi_qaic_cntl"

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 08:00:33AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 4/12/2023 7:57 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > This reverts commit 566fc96198b4bb07ca6806386956669881225271.
> > 
> > This exposes a userspace API that is still under debate.  Revert the
> > change before the uAPI gets exposed to avoid making a mistake.  QAIC is
> > otherwise still functional.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> 
> Daniel,
> 
> Assuming you find this acceptable, would you please merge it?
> 
> Sorry, but I'm still working through an internal process for my drm-misc
> commit access.  I anticipate having that resolved prior to future changes.

It should be pushed to drm-misc-next-fixes (but that's not yet ready, I
pinged Maarten).

Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

Ack from Greg/Oded would be good too for completeness.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch