[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zg7cabf6.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:11:25 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
>> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>
> I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
driver.
Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
provided by this driver?
I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists