[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDgg7sq4mXk8025W@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:34:06 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"g@...we-devbox-debian-v2" <g@...we-devbox-debian-v2>,
Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com" <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Use nested hypercall for retargeting interrupts
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:05:09AM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:23 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:35:46AM +0000, Jinank Jain wrote:
> > > In case of nested MSHV, retargeting interrupt hypercall should be sent
> > > to L0 hypervisor instead of L1 hypervisor.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com>
> >
> > Applied to hyperv-next. Thanks.
>
> I'd like to hold off on taking this change. Nuno and I are discussing
> how best to handle nested hypercalls. In addition to the proposed
> nested changes, we have hypercall changes coming as part of the
> TDX and fully enlightened SNP patch sets. If possible, I'd like to
> avoid adding logic at the hv_do_hypercall() call sites. It's not clear
> whether avoiding such logic will really be feasible, but I'd like to
> think about it for a bit before reaching that conclusion.
I thought that discussion will go on for a while but this patch fixed a
real bug.
Holding off is fine too. I will remove this patch from hyperv-next.
Thanks,
Wei.
>
> Michael
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists