[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDgwAiayuj0lCId5@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:38:26 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: david@...hat.com, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
petr.pavlu@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, song@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
mhocko@...e.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
colin.i.king@...il.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, jbaron@...mai.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] modules/kmod: replace implementation with a
sempahore
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:44:51AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Hi,
<spell checks>
Thanks, fixed!
> MAX_KMOD_ALL_BUSY_TIMEOUT * HZ ?
Yes! In the end schedule_timeout() is used so yup, thanks!
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists