[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230413184725.GA3183133@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:47:25 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the powerpc tree
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:22:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 78f0929884d4 ("powerpc/64: Always build with 128-bit long double")
>
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
>
> 4652ae7a51b7 ("drm/amd/display: Rename DCN config to FP")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the powerpc version - with "(PPC64 && ALTIVEC)")
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
This resolution is not quite right on next-20230412 and next-20230413,
as the drm tree's rename was not taken into account on the conflicting
line. In other words, I need this diff for everything to work properly.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig
index b990ef80d686..2d8e55e29637 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ config DRM_AMD_DC
depends on BROKEN || !CC_IS_CLANG || X86_64 || SPARC64 || ARM64
select SND_HDA_COMPONENT if SND_HDA_CORE
# !CC_IS_CLANG: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1752
- select DRM_AMD_DC_DCN if (X86 || (PPC64 && ALTIVEC) || (ARM64 && KERNEL_MODE_NEON && !CC_IS_CLANG))
+ select DRM_AMD_DC_FP if (X86 || (PPC64 && ALTIVEC) || (ARM64 && KERNEL_MODE_NEON && !CC_IS_CLANG))
help
Choose this option if you want to use the new display engine
support for AMDGPU. This adds required support for Vega and
Please consider resolving this in a future -next update, I was rather
surprised that my AMD test machine's graphical output was not working
until I noticed the configuration difference :)
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists